As you may know, for many years I was a priest (technically I still am), and I looked after three churches where prayers had been offered daily for centuries or millennia. Now "Following the Prime Minister’s announcement last night, it is imperative that for the health of the nation and in order for the National Health Service itself to manage the increase in those requiring medical help, the Church of England strictly observes the new guidelines on staying at home and only making journeys that are absolutely necessary, such as shopping for essential items and to take daily exercise." Apparently without demur the Church has agreed that this previous necessary duty of the priest to offer prayers for his parish in the parish church is no longer essential.
I appreciate that she or he may pray equally from her or his home, and that God does not dwell in buildings. But even so I would have hoped that the Church powers-that-be would have argued to the Government that, if only as a symbol of the essential importance of public prayer at such a time as this, the minimum of a priest praying daily for their community and nation in the central building of that community should continue. (Maybe they did. If so, it would have shown clergy respect to have said so.)
In my view it's an absolutely necessary journey. I trust that those who continue to make it aren't disciplined by the Church or fined by the State.
We live in strange times indeed. This week we'll live an one-party state with no checks and balances, answerable to no one. What's more, as my wife and I discovered when we received texts from UK_Gov telling what we "must" and must not do, it's a one-party state which knows all our private telephone numbers. Worryingly, even the Church, which has in the past spoken truth to power, seems to be silently compliant. Perhaps it will in time find its voice. Meanwhile I like the majority of us hope and trust that the Government, which is facing an unprecedented global crisis and has expert advisers - expertise is no longer despised -, is acting in the interests of the common good. And like a good chap stay at home, and muse.
An interesting after-note
A retired judge has pointed out to me that the complete sealing of churches is not the law, simply ecclesiastical guidance. The relevant piece of legislation is this:
Statutory Instruments
2020 No. 350
Public Health, England
The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020
Made
at 1.00 p.m. on 26th March 2020
Laid before Parliament
at 2.30 p.m. on 26th March 2020
Coming into force
at 1.00 p.m. on 26th March 2020
Further restrictions and closures during the emergency period
5.
(6) A place of worship may be used—
(a)for funerals,
(b)to broadcast an act of worship, whether over the internet or as part of a radio or television broadcast, or
(c)to provide essential voluntary services or urgent public support services (including the provision of food banks or other support for the homeless or vulnerable people, blood donation sessions or support in an emergency).
It is a shame Michael. My church is also closed. There are however a number of churches that are still streaming daily services.
ReplyDeleteI listened to the Sunday service from the Anglican At Peter's Church in Brighton last Sunday. The vicar gave an interesting talk about opportunities for the church at this time it is on their website. The link is https://stpetersbrighton.org/church-changing
Yes. I "attend" St Martin-in-the-Field which nourishes me. But I still feel the symbol of the priest praying for their parish and the world needs to be visible. It's like a sacrament (which I was taught was an outward and visible sign of an inward and spiritual grace). Besides not everyone lives on line or has access to the internet. In our area fliers were posted through letter-boxes with a telephone contact for the isolated.
DeleteI thought we had it about right here in Shrivenham - Serices as usual, though without a congreation but Church open for private chats with Daddy. I can see no reason why this should change. Then today I suddenly realised I am being denied Holy Communion AND I NEED SPIRITUAL FOOD.
ReplyDeleteYes, I share the feeling. There is a CofE service called "Spiritual Communion" i.e. without the elements (https://mcusercontent.com/14501d5eebc3e98fa3015a290/files/694152a6-c683-4e14-9f7c-8d055c7722e5/Spiritual_Communion.pdf?utm_source=Diocese+of+Oxford+Mailing+Lists&utm_campaign=cfdc686904-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_06_07_04_41_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_5e6b832234-cfdc686904-339852705). Personally and heretically I would take the opportunity to share with others in your home the bread (and the wine). A fortnight ago I joined with an on-line service and prayed that my bread would be consecrated along with that in the cathedral. If the Church is asking us to forego physical attendance and tell us to worship virtually, then let's do it properly! For some it will be an opportunity for ecumenism.
ReplyDeleteOne correspondent wrote to me: "We hear the Vineyard churches and some others are making Mondays days of prayer and fasting. Rather more positve than rolling over for the government."
ReplyDelete