Showing posts with label vulnerability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vulnerability. Show all posts

Saturday, 5 July 2025

In praise of tears

I don’t think I have seen anything more ugly in Parliament than Chris Philp (Shadow Home Secretary, on the right) grinning while Kemi Badenoch taunted with relish the clearly distressed Rachel Reeves: "She looks absolutely miserable." To give them their due, clearly not all Ms Badenoch's colleagues were so entertained by her remarks. But it was badly done, indeed.

When I made a comment about this on Facebook, one friend replied, "I didn’t think it could get worse than a woman going another woman for being 'miserable'. Maybe Kemi is so soulless that she’s happy to break the sisterhood. My 89yo Dad said, 'I didn’t think much of her [KB] in the first place, but now I’ve absolutely no respect whatsoever'. Utterly appalling behaviour." In my view it is no excuse to say that anything goes in politics. It should not. There's no excuse for a lack of compassion in people whose business is to care. 

Another friend commented, "It's profoundly sad that the gift of tears should be a cause of such mockery. Fear of vulnerability makes us less than human." This is something that I have learned since having MND, a condition which has exposed my emotions much to my initial discomfort. The technical term the medics use is 'lability'. I think of it as emotion unwrapped. In an article a mental health expert wrote, "Tears of pain should inspire us to reach out to the one in pain with compassion not contempt" (Rachel Newham, in Seen and Unseen).

My son and daughter-in-law visited us on Sunday and we talked among other things about Glastonbury. They recommended catching up on The Ezra Collective and we agreed that Lewis Capaldi had been a highlight. Sarah wrote to me, "He is amazing! And follow him on insta. I watched his set a couple of years ago - when he had to finish early. And then 2025 his comeback :)" In a perceptive article in Seen and Unseen, Why we loved Lewis Capaldi's Glastonbury comeback Jessica Norman wrote, "Strength and weakness are not opposing forces; instead, they are intertwined. The bridge connecting them is vulnerability. Strength in weakness provides us with a portrait of actual vulnerability, as sharing our weakness requires great strength. It has been said by many that although we might impress people with our strength, we connect with people through our weaknesses. This vulnerability provides the connection that we are built for as humans. 

"In a culture that celebrates performance, progression, and perfection, vulnerability often feels like a risk. But what if it’s our greatest strength? What if this, the trembling voice, the open heart, the tear-streaked face, is what connection is made of?" 

I was reminded how Sir Gregory Doran, the great Shakespeare director, described on Desert Island Discs Anthony Sher's explosively intense performance of Shylock's speech, "I am a Jew. Hath                  not a Jew eyes? hath not a Jew hands, organs,
dimensions, senses, affections, passions? fed with
the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject
to the same diseases, healed by the same means,
warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as
a Christian is? If you prick us, do we not bleed?
if you tickle us, do we not laugh? if you poison
us, do we not die?" That should be the moment when our antipathy and our incipient anti-semitism are replaced, at least temporarily, by total empathy and shared humanity. 

The tragic thing about Wednesday's performance in the House of Commons is that many MPs and most of the media apparently lost their connection with vulnerability, their sense of shared humanity. They chose not to believe that Ms Reeves' tears might have arisen from a "personal matter". In my experience what appears on the surface often has subterranean roots. Thank goodness even our toughest politicians aren't all performance but can show us their real humanity. We should not pillory them; we should rather honour them for it.

Sunday, 12 June 2011

Friday Night Theology

I hope Marijke won't mind me reproducing this article from "Friday Night Theology", which I loved.

Shalom in the home

10 June 2011
Men sitting on a bench
Three years ago, my dad passed away following a long illness. He died in the house he built, overlooking the trees he planted, cared for by the doctor he mentored and the family he raised. Collectively we did well in honouring him in the final stage of life. Family, friends, and carers - each contributing to the best of their ability. Peace in the house.  
Last weekend, the author Diane Athill described her care home: "This place is a dream. I'd been here for about a week and I thought: 'What is it about this place that's so marvellous?' And I realised, it is goodness - an extraordinary feeling of goodness. None of these people are anything but genuinely kind. That's the secret of a decent place."  
There's been little peace recently as far as the topic of caring for the elderly is concerned. A report earlier this year on healthcare revealed an attitude - both personal and institutional - which fails to recognise the humanity and individuality of the elderly and to respond to them with sensitivity, compassion and professionalism. A survey of residential care homes and providers of outreach services found that older people face isolation, a lack of community and funding. The drastic public sector cuts and disastrous manoeuvres in privatisationcontribute to an increased sense of vulnerability in the already vulnerable.  
In his final book The Radical Disciple, John Stott reflects on the final part of life: "We come into this world totally dependent on the love, care and protection of others. We go through a phase of life when other people depend on us. And most of us will go out of this world totally dependent on the love and care of others… It is part of the design, part of the physical nature which God has given us."  
We all have a lot to gain in the season of parent-care, as Dr Emily Ackerman explores in A Time to Care. The transformative element does not merely concern our heart and home. It is wider than that. In ancient Greece, the oikos referred to the house and everything included, such as extended family, slaves and farmland. Nomos means act, law, or principle. The Ancient Greeks first combined these two roots to form oikonomia. Eventually, the word 'economy' was born, which literally means "the principles to maintain our house". Whether that "house" is government or family is relative.  
There is a Christian imperative to develop good practice and challenge political and entrepreneurial malpractice. For poor care for the elderly is not only a tragedy, but also a scandal. Bishops have rightly called for rightdecisions and a new framework of trust. We need a vision and ardent advocacy concerning our collective 'house-keeping'. And in view of the ageing society, we need a long-term commitment. Demographic projections indicate there will be more than 11 million people over the age of 65 within 10 years. 
God's word gives us a glimpse of shalom in the community: "Once again men and women of ripe old age will sit in the streets of Jerusalem, each of them with cane in hand because of their age. The city streets will be filled with boys and girls playing there."   The imagery is one of communal wellbeing, shalom. Collectively - government, service providers, families and community - we need to do well.  
And, as far as the household of faith is concerned, caring for, and advocating on behalf of the elderly is an intrinsic part of radical discipleship.
Marijke Hoek, coordinator Forum for Change