Anyway, here is is my response:
I disagree with a number of implications in the priorities and aims:
1. That ‘preventing ill health and supporting people to live healthier lives’ is only the remit of the NHS. If other budgets are cut, e.g. education and social care, than that aim cannot be achieved.
2. That the present GP system does not provide good 24/7 care. As a patient with a chronic illness, this has been far from my experience. This aim appears to militate against small GP practices.
3. Defining as ‘long-term’ a mandate lasting ‘three or more years’ invites the possibility of continual uncertainty and upheaval to the service. It needs guaranteed stability.
I would question also the assumption that the patient knows best implied in the priority: ‘People should be given more power and control over the care that is provided to them’ whilst agreeing that it should be that ‘services are arranged around their needs and they are supported to manage their own health.’
I agree that the mandate should be clearer and more accessible to the public.
Clarity and accessibility means avoiding language incomprehensible to the public, such as: ‘in-year deliverables and metrics to measure progress’ whose meaning eludes an English graduate.
The aim of increased transparency is a laudable one, but it needs to be accompanied by increased trust, particularly of health professionals. The aim of delivering equally good service nationwide is also clearly desirable.
There is a danger in this target-driven objective of unfairly stigmatizing skilled professionals in challenging situations and driving them away from where they are most needed.
There is a further danger of diverting professionals from their primary calling of care into a culture of form-filling. This is counterproductive in the pursuit of excellence.
There is also a danger of league tables being used as ammunition in political argument, which ultimately demoralises rather than encourages. This is the stuff of bad management.
4) What views do you have on our priorities for the health and care system?
In headline terms, your priorities are ‘motherhood and apple pie’
You want to create a healthier society, particularly focusing on younger people. However, this seems less a function of the NHS than of Education and recreation.
Dementia care and research is clearly an increased priority. I am glad the government wants to put effort into those – as well as other areas of mental health. The neglect of mental health ought to be redressed; but this will need considerable financial investment both in the NHS and in community social care.
Transparency and simplicity from the patient’s perspective is desirable. However the security of digital records also needs to be paramount. The government’s principle should be to rein back on centralised record-keeping, rather than extending it. The citizen’s privacy should normally trump efficiency. Retelling one’s symptoms is a small price to pay for individual liberty.
However, creating new rights, such as the ‘right to a specific named GP’, runs the risk increasing the burden of litigiousness surrounding the medical profession as does the comparison of the health service with the airline industry – with the possibility of suing for late appointments for example. The healthcare industry is entirely different from a commercial enterprise, and should not be shoehorned into becoming one.
Whilst I am in full agreement with the aim of preventing ‘avoidable ill health and premature mortality’, I think the assumption that increasing longevity is a desirable aim should be questioned. Officiously prolonging life is not a great good and should not be ‘a metric to measure progress’. Good end of life care, however, should always be a top priority.
As already indicated, I have some reservations about the possible implications of where the objectives are specific. Otherwise they seem general enough to be open to whatever interpretation is required by policy makers. I do notice the final objective for the NHS to make money, or to be involved in its generation.
Finally it needs to be said that this consultation process is particularly opaque. The consultation document is not easy to follow, what the questions are asking isn’t obvious and where to send this response form is equally unclear. You could for example simply say, ‘Thank you for taking the trouble to complete this form. Please now send it to firstname.lastname@example.org.’