I need to add an appendix to my last
post, as I am now at home and ON LINE. You’d have thought frustration levels
couldn’t have risen from Monday, but there were a number of developments in our
Virgin Media saga.
1. On returning from the internet
café I saw some neighbours who also use Virgin Media and learned that they were
having no problems. Conclusion it was not an area problem. We passed the
information on to VM.
2. I began to receive text messages:
“Virgin Media Outage Update – ID
F…..532. We’re pleased to tell you this issue is now fixed. Best wishes, the
Virgin Media Team.” Great news – except it still wasn’t. So I wrote a message
saying, “No, it’s not. Please come and sort it out.” Only it refused to be
sent. Presumably Virgin have a one-way only text number.
3. On Monday evening and again early
on Tuesday, we had phone messages from Bangladesh saying a technician would
come and sort things out for us. Yippee! But 30 minutes and 60 minutes later we
received more phone messages telling us the issue was now fixed. It wasn’t. And
so I rang VM and told them. As Jane was out I couldn’t go through their
standardised rigmarole of checking the router lights etc which Jane had done
twice before.
Somehow the chap in Bangladesh
understood me sufficiently and in the end said that indeed a technician would
come and help that morning. Well, Nathan (for he was the longed-for technician)
arrived. He ran checks and changed the router. Still it was not working…. So he
went to the local junction box and found that our line hadn’t been labelled and
had a “noise blocker” on it. When and why it was put there is a mystery, but
now at last we’re on line again. Phew! Nathan said we might receive a customer
satisfaction survey. That was to do with his
performance – not Virgin Media’s. If it were the latter, it would be way into
negative scores. Nathan’s would be highly positive. Thanks, Nathan.
No comments:
Post a Comment